转基因的健康发展必须超越“实质等同”评价原则
本文围绕转基因食品的“实质等同”原则下的食用安全性评价方式存在的问题进行深入讨论, 并从实验动物饲料配方的高营养性及动物体质因素与人类的差异, 以及评价定位不准和标准过于宽松等方面, 对“实质等同”评价的“严谨性”和“科学性” 进行质疑。并对评价方式不科学带来的严重后果进行剖析和阐述。通过逆向思维, 创新建立的损益指数及累计积分(BDI-GS)食品功效及安全性评价新体系具有明显的科学性和实用价值, 并为转基因作物及食品的研究和发展指明方向。相信只有超越“实质等同”的评价原则, 我国的转基因事业才会迎来灿烂的明天。
In this paper, some existing problems in the principle of ‘substantial equivalence’ for genetically modified foods were in-depth discussed, while edible safety evaluation, and with respect to ‘strictness’ and ‘scientific’ of the ‘substantial equivalence’ evaluation approach was questioned from feed formula of experimental animal with high-nutritional trait leading to the difference with humans’ nutrition, and different physical conditions of animal with human, as well as too loose standards and inaccurate positioning of evaluation, etc.. And scientific analysis and explanation were given for that the unscientific evaluation approach could bring us quite serious consequences. By means of reverse thinking innovation, Benefit-Damage Index -General Score (BDI–GS) food evaluation system should be established for functions and safety, and the directions for research and development of genetically modified crops and foods were pointed out. We believe that as long as surpass the evaluation of ‘substantial equivalence’ principle, genetically modified organism (GMO) in China can have a bright future.
标题：转基因的健康发展必须超越“实质等同”评价原则
英文标题：Healthy development of genetically modified organism must surpass the ‘substantial equivalence’ evaluation principle
作者：
周则卫 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院放射医学研究所
中文关键词:实质等同,转基因食品,食用安全性,BDI-GS体系,评价方式,
英文关键词:substantial equivalence,genetically modified foods,edible safety,Benefit-Damage Index -General Score system,evaluation approach,
发表日期：2014-04-11
- 文件大小:
- 192.99 KB
- 下载次数:
- 60
-
高速下载
|
