青岛地铁土压平衡盾构碎石土改良方法研究
摘要:盾构在碎石土地层掘进时经常面临着地层渗透性强、刀盘扭矩大、刀具磨损严重等诸多困难。为解决上述施工难题，以青岛地铁4号线典型的碎石土地层为研究对象，首先通过颗粒筛分、LCPC试验和渗透性试验评价了碎石土的基本特性，结合传统的砂土和黏性土改良方案设计了5组碎石土改良配比方案，对不同配比方案进行坍落度试验、渗透性试验和直剪试验，分析了不同改良指标碎石土的流塑性、渗透性及抗剪力学特性，根据实际工程中盾构刀盘扭矩的变化情况验证了泡沫与聚合物组合改良的最佳方案。研究表明：7%浓度泡沫与5%浓度聚合物配比的改良剂能够有效降低碎石土的渗透系数，同时起到降低刀盘扭矩的作用。
Abstract:Shield tunneling in gravel stratum is often faced with many difficulties such as large torque of cutterhead, tool wear, and poor slag. Aiming at the research problem of reasonable conditioning index of gravel soil, the typical gravel soil layer of Qingdao Metro Line 4 is taken as the research object. Firstly, the basic characteristics of gravel soil are evaluated by particle screening, LCPC test, and permeability test. Five groups of gravel soil conditioning schemes were designed based on the traditional conditioning schemes of sand and clay soil. Slump test, permeability test, and direct shear test were carried out to analyze the flow plasticity, permeability and shear resistance characteristics of gravel soil with different conditioning indices. Finally, the best scheme of foam and polymer combination conditioning was verified according to the variation of torque of the shield machine in practical engineering. The results show that the mixture of 7% foam and 5% polymer can effectively reduce the permeability coefficient of gravel soil, maintain certain plasticity, and play a role in reducing the torque of the cutterhead and improving tunneling efficiency.
中文标题：
青岛地铁土压平衡盾构碎石土改良方法研究
Research on Conditioning Method of Gravel Soil in Qingdao Metro Shield Construction
作者：
冀海峰1,,刘卫景1,赵国梁1,牛宇哲2,,肖凤春1,江玉生2,杨星2
Ji Haifeng1,,Liu Weijing1,Zhao Guoliang1,Niu Yuzhe2,,Xiao Fengchun1,Jiang Yusheng2,Yang Xing2
作者简介:冀海峰，男，1979年生，河北张家口人，硕士，高级工程师，主要从事工程项目管理工作。E-mail：1966620671@qq.com
通讯地址：
1.青岛市地铁四号线有限公司，山东青岛 266045 2.中国矿业大学（北京） 力学与土木工程学院，北京 100083
1.QingdaoMetroLine4Co.,Ltd.,Qingdao266045,Shandong,China 2.CollegeofMechanicsandCivilEngineering,ChinaUniversityofMiningandTechnology-Beijing,Beijing100083,China
中图分类号:U455
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2993.2024.01.002
出版物：岩土工程技术
收稿日期:2022-06-21
修回日期:2023-03-13
录用日期:2023-07-14
网络出版日期:2024-02-05
刊出日期:2024-02-05
关键词:地铁,土压平衡盾构,碎石土,坍落度,渗透性,直剪试验
Key words:subway,earth pressure balance shield,gravel soil,slump test,permeability,direct shear test
文档包含图片数量：图片(9)张
文档包含表格数量：表格(4)个
参考文献：
[1]徐琳琳,余 金,蒋亚龙,等. 泡沫性能测试及其在富水砂层渣土改良中应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(S1):345-353.
[2]邱 龑,杨新安,唐卓华,等. 富水砂层土压平衡盾构施工渣土改良试验[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(11):1703-1708. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2015.11.014
[3]刘 飞,杨小龙,冉江陵,等. 基于盾构掘进效果的富水砾砂地层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(10):1426-1432.
[4]胡长明,崔 耀,王雪艳,等. 土压平衡盾构施工穿越砂层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2013,45(6):761-766. doi: 10.15986/j.1006-7930.2013.06.006
[5]黄志强,冯东林. 生石灰膨润土泥浆土压盾构渣土改良试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(1):128-133.
[6]刘朋飞,王树英,阳军生,等. 渣土改良剂对黏土液塑限影响及机理分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(6):91-96. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201707025
[7]王洪新,陈大羽,商涛平,等. 土压平衡盾构渣土改良的合理坍落度研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(1):148-157,188.
[8]王明胜,路军富,罗奥雷. 粉质黏土地层隧道盾构施工渣土改良剂试验[J]. 铁道工程学报,2020,37(5):74-79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2020.05.014
[9]李 杰,郭京波,戴树合,等. 复合地层盾构施工中泡沫对刀盘扭矩的影响分析及参数优化[J]. 隧道建设,2016,36(8):906-910. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2016.08.003
[10]SUN Z,YANG Z,JIANG Y,et al. Influence of particle size distribution, test time, and moisture content on sandy stratum LCPC abrasivity test results[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2020,80(1):611-625.
[11]HU W,ROSTAMI J. A new method to quantify rheology of conditioned soil for application in EPB TBM tunneling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,2020,96:103192. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103192
[12]丁彦杰. 高压富水砂层土压平衡盾构的土体改良技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2020.
[13]陈青生,李宇轩,肖衡林,等. 考虑颗粒级配影响的高聚物改良钙质砂抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2020,20(28):11718-11724. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2020.28.047
[14]申兴柱,高 锋,王 帆,等. 土压平衡盾构穿越透水砾砂层渣土改良试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2017,61(4):121-125. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.2017.04.026
[15]孟宪雷. 土压平衡盾构区段粉质黏土渣土改良技术探讨[J]. 现代城市轨道交通,2020,(2):54-57.
[16]YANG Z Y,YANG X,DING Y J,et al. Characteristics of conditioned sand for EPB shield and its influence on cutterhead torque[J]. Acta Geotechnica,2022,17(12):5813-5828. doi: 10.1007/s11440-022-01666-7
[17]YANG X,YANG Z Y,ZHANG X Y,et al. Experimental study on the influences of water content, consolidation time, and soil conditioning on the adhesion of clay in EPB shields[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment,2022,81(10):426. doi: 10.1007/s10064-022-02941-3
[18]张润来,宫全美,周顺华,等. 砂卵石地层土压平衡盾构施工渣土改良试验[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(5):673-680. doi: 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2019.05.012
[19]王树英,令凡琳,黄 硕. 泡沫改良粗粒渣土渗透性计算模型及适用性对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(11):2357-2365. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.1141
[20]郭文琦,王士民,刘川昆,等. 淤泥质土及其改良土体动力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2019,63(11):121-125. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.201901190001
[21]叶朝良,谢玉芳,曹风旭,等. 饱和状态下海积软土一维渗透固结特征试验研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2021,65(3):28-33. doi: 10.13238/j.issn.1004-2954.201912040003
[22]杨玉玲,杜延军,范日东,等. 分散剂改良土–膨润土竖向隔离墙材料黏度试验研究[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,44(3):650-654. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2014.03.035
[23]张 研,梁卓悦,廖逸夫. 基于相关向量机的富水砂层渣土改良试验效果预测[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(17):7293-7298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2021.17.045
[24]郭付军,赵振威,张 杰,等. 使用聚合物对纯砂层进行渣土改良的试验研究[J]. 隧道建设,2017,37(S1):53-58. doi: 10.3973/j.issn.1672-741X.2017.S1.009
[25]杨志勇,乐贵平,江玉生,等. 北京地区典型地层土压平衡盾构渣土改良技术[J]. 施工技术,2017,46(1):58-60,79.
基金项目：
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目（U1261212）
- 文件大小:
- 3.46 MB
- 下载次数:
- 60
-
高速下载
|
